Homepage Free Da 2166 9 1 Template
Jump Links

The DA Form 2166-9-1, commonly known as the Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for Sergeants, plays a crucial role in the evaluation process of non-commissioned officers within the U.S. Army. This form is designed to assess the performance and potential of sergeants, ensuring that their contributions to the Army are accurately documented and acknowledged. It includes several key sections that gather essential administrative data, such as the soldier's name, Social Security Number, rank, and unit information, as well as the period of evaluation. Furthermore, the form captures the insights of both the rater and senior rater, who provide their signatures and evaluations of the NCO's performance across various competencies, including leadership, professionalism, and overall potential. The DA Form 2166-9-1 emphasizes the importance of accurate reporting and accountability, as it requires the rated NCO to verify the correctness of the information provided. This form not only serves as a tool for performance assessment but also helps guide future career development and opportunities for advancement within the Army. Understanding the intricacies of this evaluation form is essential for both NCOs and their evaluators, as it lays the foundation for effective communication and growth within military ranks.

Key takeaways

Here are key takeaways for filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form:

  • Accurate Information is Crucial: Ensure all administrative data in Part I is correct. This includes names, SSNs, ranks, and unit information.
  • Understand the Purpose: This form evaluates the performance and potential of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). Use it to provide constructive feedback.
  • Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO's signature indicates they have seen the completed report. It does not imply agreement with the ratings.
  • Performance Evaluation Matters: In Part IV, assess various attributes such as character, presence, and intellect. Provide specific comments to support your evaluations.
  • Senior Rater's Role: The senior rater must provide an overall assessment of the rated NCO’s potential. This includes comparing them to peers.
  • Follow the Appeals Process: The rated NCO should be aware of their right to appeal any part of the evaluation, as outlined in AR 623-3.

Dos and Don'ts

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, consider the following guidelines:

  • Do ensure all personal information is accurate, including name, SSN, and rank.
  • Do provide complete and clear descriptions of daily duties and areas of special emphasis.
  • Do include all required signatures and dates in Part II to validate the report.
  • Do verify that the rated NCO's email address is correctly entered.
  • Don't leave any sections blank; all fields must be filled out as required.
  • Don't use abbreviations or jargon that may not be understood by all readers.
  • Don't submit the form without reviewing it for errors or omissions.
  • Don't forget to check compliance with the Privacy Act Statement as outlined in AR 623-3.

Documents used along the form

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial document used in the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. It provides a structured way to assess an NCO's performance, professionalism, and potential. However, it is often accompanied by other forms and documents that serve various purposes in the evaluation process. Below is a list of some of these essential documents, along with a brief description of each.

  • DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is used for the evaluation of NCOs in the rank of Staff Sergeant and above. It builds on the DA Form 2166-9-1 by providing a more comprehensive evaluation framework for higher-ranking NCOs.
  • DA Form 1059: This document is a school evaluation report. It is used to assess the performance of soldiers who have completed a military school or training program. It highlights the soldier's achievements and skills acquired during the course.
  • Arizona University Application form: This form is essential for students applying to Arizona State University, Northern Arizona University, or the University of Arizona. It includes vital details about the applicant and can request a waiver of the application fee for those with financial needs. For more information, visit arizonapdfs.com/arizona-university-application-template/.
  • DA Form 4856: The developmental counseling form is utilized for documenting counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. It serves as a record of discussions about performance, expectations, and development goals.
  • DA Form 4187: This form is used for personnel actions, such as requests for reassignments, promotions, or other changes in duty status. It helps facilitate administrative changes in a soldier's career.
  • DA Form 7500: The Army's evaluation report appeals form allows soldiers to appeal their evaluations if they believe there has been an error or unfair assessment. It provides a formal process for addressing concerns.
  • DA Form 3349: This is the physical profile form, which documents a soldier's physical limitations. It is essential for determining if a soldier can meet the physical demands of their duties.
  • DA Form 2166-9-1-1: This is an addendum to the main evaluation report, providing additional details or comments from the rater or senior rater. It can clarify points made in the primary evaluation.
  • DA Form 7501: This form is used for documenting the results of a soldier's physical fitness test. It includes the soldier's scores and any relevant comments regarding their physical readiness.

Each of these forms plays a vital role in the overall evaluation and development process for NCOs. Understanding their purpose and how they relate to the DA Form 2166-9-1 can help ensure that evaluations are thorough, fair, and beneficial for both the soldiers and the Army as a whole.

Things to Know About This Form

What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The DA 2166 9 1 form serves as an NCO Evaluation Report specifically for Sergeants. It is designed to assess the performance and potential of non-commissioned officers within the Army. The evaluations recorded on this form are crucial for personnel decisions, including promotions, assignments, and professional development opportunities.

Who is required to complete the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The form must be completed by the rater, who is typically the immediate supervisor of the NCO being evaluated. Additionally, a senior rater must also provide their assessment. In some cases, a supplementary reviewer may be involved to ensure a comprehensive evaluation process.

What information is required in Part I of the form?

Part I includes essential administrative data about the rated NCO. This section requires the following information:

  • Name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
  • Social Security Number or DOD ID Number
  • Rank and Date of Rank
  • Primary Military Occupational Specialty Code (PMOSC)
  • Unit, Organization, Station, ZIP Code or APO, Major Command
  • Status Code and Unit Identification Code (UIC)
  • Reason for Submission
  • Period Covered by the Evaluation
  • Rated Months and Nonrated Codes
  • Number of Enclosures
  • Rated NCO's email address

What is the significance of the counseling dates in Part II?

Counseling dates are critical as they indicate when the rated NCO received feedback regarding their performance. Initial and subsequent counseling sessions help ensure that the NCO understands expectations and areas for improvement. These dates must be documented accurately to reflect the ongoing support and guidance provided to the NCO throughout the evaluation period.

How is performance evaluated in Part IV?

Part IV focuses on evaluating various aspects of the NCO's performance. This section includes assessments of:

  • Character
  • Presence
  • Intellect
  • Leadership abilities
  • Development of others
  • Achievement of results

Each category is rated as either "Met Standard" or "Did Not Meet Standard," with space for comments to provide context and examples of performance.

What does the senior rater assess in Part V?

The senior rater evaluates the rated NCO's overall potential compared to peers in the same grade. They select one of four categories: Most Qualified, Highly Qualified, Qualified, or Not Qualified. Additionally, the senior rater must list two successive assignments and one broadening assignment, which helps to provide a more comprehensive view of the NCO's career trajectory and potential for future roles.

What should the rated NCO understand about their signature on the form?

The rated NCO's signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with the evaluations provided by the rater or senior rater. Instead, it confirms that the NCO has reviewed the administrative data, the duty description, and understands the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. This acknowledgment is essential for maintaining transparency and accountability in the evaluation process.

Preview - Da 2166 9 1 Form

HQDA#:

Attachments Menu

NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)

For use of this form, see AR 623-­3 and DA PAM 623-­3 the proponent agency is DCS, G-­1.

SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

IN AR 623-­3

PART I ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

c. RANK

d. DATE OF RANK

e. PMOSC

f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND

g. STATUS CODE

h. UIC

i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION

j. PERIOD COVERED

FROMTHRU

YEAR MONTH DAY

YEAR MONTH DAY

k.RATED MONTHS

l.NONRATED CODES

m. NO OF ENCLOSURES

n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

PART II AUTHENTICATION

a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE

a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

a5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE

b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

b5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

c1. SUPPLEMENTARY

c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER

c3. RANK

PMOSC/

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

REVIEW REQUIRED?

(Last, First, Middle Initial)

 

 

BRANCH

 

 

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c4. COMMENTS

 

c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE

c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD)

 

c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS

ENCLOSED?

 

 

 

 

 

 

(.gov or .mil)

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-­3.

d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL

LATER

LATER

LATER

d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE

d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

PART III DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)

a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE

b. DUTY MOSC

c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)

d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS

e.APPOINTED DUTIES

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile:

Date:

b. Height:

Weight:

Within Standard?

(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile

c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

COMMENTS:

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

Page 1 of 2

APD LC v1.00ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

SSN (or DOD ID No.)

THRU DATE

 

 

 

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

d. PRESENCE: (Military and professional

COMMENTS:

bearing, Fitness, Confidence, Resilience.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

 

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

e. INTELLECT: (Mental agility, Sound judgment, COMMENTS:

Innovation, Interpersonal tact, Expertise.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

f. LEADS: (Leads others, Builds trust, Extends COMMENTS:

influence beyond the chain of command, Leads by

example Communicates.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

g. DEVELOPS: (Creates a positive command/ COMMENTS:

workplace environment, Fosters esprit de corps,

Prepares self, Develops others, Stewards the

profession.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

h. ACHIEVES: (Gets results.)

COMMENTS:

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATER OVERALL PERFORMANCE

 

i. I currently rate

NCOs in this grade.

 

COMMENTS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART V SENIOR RATER OVERALL POTENTIAL

a. Select one box representing Rated

b. COMMENTS:

 

NCO’s potential compared to others in the

 

 

same grade whom you have rated in your

 

 

career. I currently senior rate

 

 

NCOs in this grade.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOST QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIGHLY QUALIFIED

 

 

QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOT QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment (3-­5 years).

 

Successive Assignment:

1)

 

 

2)

Broadening Assignment:

 

 

 

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

 

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APD PE v1.00ES

Document Specifics

Fact Name Description
Form Purpose The DA 2166-9-1 form is used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army.
Governing Regulations This form is governed by Army Regulation (AR) 623-3 and DA Pamphlet (PAM) 623-3.
Privacy Act Compliance The form includes a Privacy Act Statement, ensuring that personal information is handled properly.
Authentication Requirements Raters and senior raters must sign the form, verifying the accuracy of the evaluation.
Submission Period The form covers a specific evaluation period, detailing the start and end dates of the assessment.

How to Fill Out Da 2166 9 1

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form is an important step in evaluating a Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO). This form requires careful attention to detail to ensure accuracy in reporting. Follow these steps to fill out the form correctly.

  1. Administrative Data: Fill in your name (last, first, middle initial), SSN or DOD ID number, rank, date of rank, PMOSC, unit or organization, station, ZIP code or APO, major command, status code, UIC, reason for submission, period covered (from and through), rated months, non-rated codes, number of enclosures, and rated NCO's email address.
  2. Authentication: Enter the name, SSN, signature, and date for both the rater and senior rater. Include their rank, PMOSC/branch, organization, duty assignment, and email addresses.
  3. Supplementary Review: If applicable, provide the name, rank, PMOSC/organization, and signature of the supplementary reviewer. Indicate if a review is required and add any comments.
  4. Counseling Dates: Record the initial and subsequent counseling dates. The rated NCO must sign and date this section.
  5. Duty Description: Describe the principal duty title, duty MOSC, daily duties and scope, areas of special emphasis, and appointed duties.
  6. Performance Evaluation: For each category (character, presence, intellect, leads, develops, achieves), indicate if the standard was met or not. Provide comments for each category.
  7. Senior Rater Overall Potential: Select the appropriate box to represent the rated NCO’s potential compared to others in the same grade. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

After completing the form, review all sections for accuracy. Ensure that all required signatures are obtained. This form will be submitted as part of the NCO evaluation process.